Do you know why Lalu Yadav was asking for Rs 80,001 as basic salary for MPs? No, it’s got nothing to do with the salary of cabinet secretary as was being widely reported in the media. You see, if you have nine kids you need that kind of money to run your household. Don’t you? OK, I know that was a poor joke. Nonetheless, I find myself agreeing with Lalu Yadav for reasons which I feel are worth talking about.
There has been a wide debate in the national media on this issue and the feeling that comes out of most of the debates in newspapers and TV channels is that since politicians are as it is quite corrupt why should we give them more money? It very clearly shows the antagonism that the Indian middle class has towards our politicians. Well, that antagonism may be quite valid to say the very least, but it would be incorrect for us to justify this antagonism and link it to the pay hike.
While this hike may not reduce corruption in our polity it may well encourage honest young Indians to enter politics. Don’t be surprised guys because there are still a whole lot of MPs in our parliament for whom this salary is the only source of income. If you really break down the Rs 1.6 lakhs that MPs will now get, you’ll see that this is not really an exorbitant amount to be paid to a lawmaker for a country as big as ours. Include the income tax, the money spent on chai-pakora to visitors, gifts to poor from respective constituencies etc etc and you’ll see what I’m talking about.
Though quite a few newspapers and TV channels have made comparisons between salaries of MPs of other countries vis-a-vis ours I feel that this is misplaced simply because the cost of living in India is much lesser than anywhere else. What we should be comparing these salaries is with those of executives from corporate sector here in India, for two reasons. Firstly, because we live here in India and secondly, because we want to attract talented and capable people to join politics. By that analogy Rs 1.6 lakhs does not really seem too much at all.
Yet another thing which has been blown out of proportion is the fact that nearly 300 of our MPs are already crorepatis, and therefore why should we give them more? Well, firstly, a crorepati MP doesn’t mean that he has one crore in cash. That’s his net asset value including property which may or may not have been inherited by him/her. Secondly, let me remind you guys that in today’s times what the hell is a crore in any case! Anyone who has a decent a couple of bedrooms flat in any decent locality in any city in the country is a crorepati today. So what crorepatis are we talking about? Yes, there are Vijay Mallyas, Digvijay Singhs and Naveen Jindals who are multi millionaires many times over but they do not bear the expenses of MPs who are not.
Lastly, let me point out that by discussing the pay hike we are missing the whole point here. What we indeed should be discussing is the accountability of the funds that they control (Rs 2 crore per yr for their constituency) and their overall productivity. Let them take some more money if they wish to but they need to work to justify this hike
You need to be a member of YouBihar.com - Bihar Social Networking and Online Community to add comments!
Join YouBihar.com - Bihar Social Networking and Online Community